SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 945

G.N.RAY, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Purna Chandra Sen Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent And Remembrancer Of Legal Affairs To The Government Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.P.MUKHERJI, G.S.CHATTERJEE, RATHIN DAS, TAPAS RAY

JUDGMENT

K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. - Both these appeals are filed against the common judgment of the High Court of Calcutta reversing the order of acquittal passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate. Siliguri.

2. Six accused were tried by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate for an offence punishable under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 (Act for short). According to the prosecution on 20.8.1972. M.K. Tewari P.W. 1 was posted at Siliguri Junction diesel shed as S.I. of R.P.F. On that day at about 3.30 hrs. he found 617 persons pushing a hand trolley towards gate No. 5 leading to shunting neck which was loaded with some heavy materials. P.W. 1 suspected the activities of those persons and raised an alarm by blowing his whistle. As soon as he came out of gate No. 3 he also found A.S.I., P.W. 3 and another Rakshak near Y.M. Office. He told them to arrest the persons for moving the trolley. All of them rounded them up but three of them managed to escape and they could arrest three accused persons namely P.C. Sen Gupta. K. Appanaidu and Budhi Kr. Routh. original accused Nos. 4 to 6. P.W. 1 and the other officer found that the trolley was loaded





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top