SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1078

M.M.PUNCHHI, M.K.MUKHERJEE, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
P. K. Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
E.M.S.ANAM, M.A.Firoz, M.T.George, P.Kesava Pillai, R.SASIPRABHU

JUDGMENT

K Jayachandra Reddy, J. - In Sessions Case No. 35 of 1987 on the file of the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Ernakulam, four accused were tried for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 323, 326, 302 and 201 I.P.C. The trial court acquitted A-4 and convicted A-1 under Section 120-B read with 302 I.P.C. and also convicted A-2 and A-3 under Sections 302 read with 120-B I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life. On appeal, the High Court acquitted A-3 but confirmed the convictions and sentences of A-1, P. K. Narayanan and A-2, V.V. Salim @ Sasi. Hence, A-1 has filed Criminal Appeal No. 315/90 and A-2 has filed Criminal Appeal No. 316/90 in this Court. The prosecution case is as follows:

2. A-1 is the owner and proprietor of Polakulath Tourist Home at Palarivattom, Ernakulam and two such other tourist homes in other places in addition to being an abkari contractor. V.V. Salim @ Sasi, A-2 was his driver and personal body-guard. A-3 was a room boy in the tourist home and A-4 was the Manager of A-1. The deceased Peethambaran was in employment of A-1 since June, 1992. He was an honest youngman and was a faithful and trusted employee. He was also a pe

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top