SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 596

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P B. Sawant and N.P. Singh, JJ.
State of Gujarat - Appellant
versus
Gadhvi Rambhai Nathabhai & Ors.- Respondents
Crl. Appeal Nos. 357, 358 of 1994
Decided on 20.6.1994
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant: Altaf Ahmed, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Anip Sachthey and Nigam Shukla.
For the Respondents: Ram Jethmalani, Uday Kumar Sagar, P.R. Parekh, S. Fazal and Rajesh Kumar.

Advocates:
Altaf Ahmed, Anip Sachthey, MINAKSHI ARORA, NIGAM SHUKLA, P.H.Parekh, RAJESH SHARMA, RAM JETHMALANI, S.FAZAL, UDAY SAGAR

IMPORTANT POINT
While exercising the power to grant bail, the Designated Court is not expected to exercise the power of the Trial Court and to record a finding which is expected to be recorded at the conclusion of the trial.

Headnote:Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 4, 5 & 20 (8) Arms Act - Section 25 - Customs Act - Section 135 - Prosecution for offences under. Bail Application - Designated Court virtually purported to acquit accused while holding that no case for contravention of any provisions of TADA has been made out" - Order of release on bail not legally sustainable - While exercising power to grant bail, Designated Court is not expected to record a finding which is to be recorded at conclusion of trial.

       Held: It is true that for the purpose of grant of bail, the framers of the Act require the Designated Court to be satisfied that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the accused concerned was not guilty of such offence but this power cannot be exercised for grant of bail in a manner which amounts virtually to an order of acquittal, giving benefit of doubt to the accused person after weighing the evidence collected during the investigation or produced before the Court. At that stage the Designated Court is expected to apply its mind as to whether accepting the allegation made on behalf of the prosecution on their face, there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused concerned was not guilty of the offence. At that stage the Designated Court is not required to weigh the material collected during the investigation. The Designated Court itself while dealing with the submission of the counsel for the State regarding the involvement of the accused persons in. Bombay Bomb Blast has observed: "... it would be too early to involve any person in the recent event of the country without probable nexus". Still while examining as to whether there were reasonable grounds for believing that the accused were not guilty of such offence, the Designated Court has passed an order of acquittal even before conclusion of the investigation. (Para 7)

       

JUDGMENT

N.P. Singh, J. - Leave granted.

2. These appeals have been filed on behalf of the State of Gujarat against orders passed by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as TADA Act) directing release of the Respondents Gadhvi Rambhai Nathabhai, Karu Rambhai Gadhvi, Ritesth Vajshi Pindariya, Nagshibhai Nathabhai, Hamir Sajan Ahir, Ranmal Bogha Ahir, Bhimshi Lakhman and Ibrahim Rasam Vagher, on bail. The said respondents are alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 25(1)(a)(b), 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-AAA), 25(1-B) of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the TADA Act and Section 135 of the Customs Act.

3. It is the case of the prosecution that on receipt of an information on 19.6.1993, that accused-respondents Gadhvi Rambhai Nathabhai and Hitesth Vajshi Pindariya had stored smuggled arms and ammunitions in their residential premises, situated at Harsidhinagar of Khambhalia town, the District Superintendent of Police along with the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, two Deputy Superintendents of Police and other officials, raided the residential house of the aforesaid accused persons. During the search, Sub-Machine Gun made in Spain, several foreign made Revolvers and Pistols and cash amounting to Rs. 1,07,00,000/- (Rupees One crore and seven lakhs) were recovered from accused- respondent Gadhvi Rambhai Nathabhai. Several foreign made arms, huge quantity of cartridges and Rs. 1,07,67,000/- (Rupees One crore seven lakhs and sixty-seven thousand) were also recovered from accused-respondent Nagshibhai Nathabhai. It is also the case of the prosecution that from a Jeep Car near the farm house of accused Hamir Sajan Ahir, a gunny bag was recovered in which there were two A.K. 56 Rifles, one Tomy Gun, two Pistols, two empty magazines of A.K. 56 Rifles, two big Walky Talky sets, a small Transmiter, 98 cartridges of twelve bore, 191 cartridges of A.K. 56 Rifles, 35 cartridges of Revolver. Similarly, from other accused persons several foreign made Pistols and arms are alleged to have been recovered. It is alleged that the accused-respondents are working as main landing agents of notorious smugglers and the prime accused Haji Ismail who is controlling the activities from Dubai. In the special leave petitions filed before this Court, it has been stated on behalf of the State that contraband articles like arms, ammunitions and explosives were being freely distributed in the troubled parts of the country like Punjab, Assam and Kashmir on a very large scale.

4. The Designated Court after referring to the case of the prosecution and recovery of arms and ammunitions from the different accused persons observed in the impugned order:

"The accused prima facie, seem to have been involved in illegal import or otherwise possession of arms and ammunitions and the charge is difficult to be dislodged in view of the disclosure from the papers of investigations. However, there is a strong controversy regarding the applicability or otherwise and attraction of various provisions of the TADA Act."

Thereafter, it has said:

"It is true that the accused are or were found to be in possession of Arms and ammunitions without permit or licence but there is nothing on record even to remotely connect them and prima facie establish that any of them had intended to over-awe the Government by law established or to strike terror in the people on any section of the people or to alienate any section of the people or to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections of the people or did any act or thing by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substance or committed or conspired or attempted to commit or abetted to commit activities as mentioned in Secs. 3 and 4 of the TADA Act. The Accused are simply the persons who had been lastly found in possession of such arms and ammunitions. The learned pipe. Mr. H.O. Bhatt tried to establish the connection with the recent Bombay Bomb Blast














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top