SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 359

FAIZAN UDDIN, G.N.RAY
Mohansingh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Indu Malhotra, RISHI KESH

JUDGMENT

Faizan Uddin, J. - This appeal under Section 16 of the Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 has been directed against the judgment dated 15.4.1988 passed by the Additional Judge, Designated Court, Faridabad at Narnaul in T & DA (P) Act Case No. 3/1988 whereby the appellants has been convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act read with Section 5 of C Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as TADA) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of RS. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months.

2. The prosecution case was that on 25.10.1987 when Sub-Inspector. Baljit Singh. PW 7 alongwith other police officials was on sic for checking Railway Station they spotted the appellant sitting in the waiting hall of the railway station, Rewari and seeing Police party started walking which raised suspicion. On personal search of the appellant one country made 12 bore pistol, Ext P 1 was recovered from the right side dub of his pant for which the appellant had no permit or licence. The said pistol was seized from the possession of the appella








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top