SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1017

A.S.ANAND, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Baldevsingh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
AMITA GUPTA, M.S.GUJRAL, P.P.SINGH, R.S.Suri

JUDGMENT

K.S. Paripoornan, J. - Accused No.1 Baldev Singh son of Roor Singh and Accused No.3 Roor Singh son of Khushal Singh in Case No. 49/ 84 - Trial No. 39/84 of the Court of Shri M.L. Merchea, Judge, Special Court, Ferozepur have filed this appeal under Section 14 of the Terrorists Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act of 1984 (hereinafter referred to as Act) against their conviction and sentence dated 3-1-1985. There were four accused in this case. Accused No.2 Sham Singh son of Roor Singh and Accused No. 4 Shamsheer Singh son of Roor Singh were acquitted by the same judgment. The State has not filed any appeal against the acquittal of accused Nos. 2 and 4.

1. The deceased No. 1, Balbir Singh and deceased No.2 Amrik Singh and accused Nos. 1 to 4 are near relations. The following chart will help to understand the relationship of the parties inter se:

Khushal Singh

|

| |

Amrik Singh Roor Singh

(Deceased No.2) (Accused No.3)



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top