SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 967

M.M.PUNCHHI, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (Delhi Administration) – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V.BALARAM DAS, BINU TARNTA, J.P.Verghese, RANJANA NARAYAN, S.N.TERDAL, S.P.SHARMA, V.C.MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

Punchhi, J. - Permission to rile special leave petition sought by the mother and brother of the petitioner, Ashok Kumar vide Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1593 of 1995 is refused. Leave granted to Ashok Kumar, petitioner on his petition from jail.

2. This appeal by Ashok Kumar is to challenge the judgment and order of the Delhi High Court dated January 10, 1995, whereby he has been held guilty for the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to death. His co-accused Smt. Prem Kanwar stands convicted for offence under Section 302/34 IPC, for which she has been sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-, in default of payment of which she has further to undergo 3-1/2 years rigorous imprisonment. Smt. Prem Kanwar has not appealed against her conviction and sentence. So instantly we are only concerned with Ashok Kumar.

3. The prosecution case is woven like this:

Both the accused, Ashok Kumar and Smt. Prem Kanwar belong to the same village in the State of Rajasthan. Both the accused had a long knit physical intimacy with each other. While so Smt. Prem Kanwar was given in marriage to Mahabir Singh, deceased. The marriage made no difference









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top