SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1244

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.S. Anand & K. Venkataswami, JJ.
Mukhtiar Singh & Ors. - Appellants
versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 480 of 1985
Decided on 30-11-1995

Advocates:
AMITA GUPTA, R.C.Kohli, R.L.Kohli, R.S.Suri

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 Appellant convicted for murder of his wife Death was due to coma as a result of dislocation of 2nd & 3rd cervical vertebrates - Evidence regarding motive that deceased was being maltreated by her husband & other members of family found scanty - Testimony of sole eye witness found belied by his conduct - Though closely related to deceased he did not inform about what he had seen to anyone - Evidence regarding extra-judicial confession found falsely introduced which exposed tainted nature of investigation - Doctor admitted the possibility of injuries due to fall from a height - No bony injury found on places where injuries were located - Deceased was taken for cremation after 20 hours of her death & trial Court finding that it was in hot haste is Conjecturous - conviction is unsustainable.(Paras 4 to 6)

       

ORDER

A.S. Anand, J. - The appellants along with Gurmukh Singh and Sunder Singh were sent up for trial before the learned Additional Judge of the Special Court, Ferozepur Zone, Faridkot for various offences in collection with the death of Pritam Kaur wife of Mukhtiar Singh appellant. Gurmukh Singh and Sunder Singh were acquitted of all the charges. Appellant Mukhtiar Singh was convicted for an offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default, to undergo six months R.I. The remaining appellants Kartar Singh, Ram Singh, Dhan Singh and Piara Singh were convicted for the offence under Section 201 IPC and sentenced to two years RI each and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for one month each. They have filed this appeal under Section 14 of the Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984 challenging their conviction and sentence.

2. The prosecution case is that Pritam Kaur deceased was married to Mukhtiar Singh appellant. She was the cousin sister of Kartar Singh PW3 and Badri Singh PW5. The relationship between Mukhtiar Singh and Pritam Kaur - deceased were said to be strained and the deceased was being maltreated in her matrimonial home. On 11.3.84, Kartar Singh PW 3 - a cousin of the deceased and Sarpanch of the village was irrigating his field at about 5 p.m. when he heard noise from the side of the house of the appellants and went there. He found all the appellants present armed with dangs. In his presence, Kartar Singh appellant exhorted his sons to finish Pritam Kaur deceased and thereupon his sons assaulted the deceased with dangs on various parts of her body. Appellant Mukhtiar Singh dealt a dang blow on the back of the neck of Pritam Kaur as a result of which she fell down and died. Kartar Singh PW3 protested but was told to mind his own affairs by the appellants. He left for the village and on the way, met Bhag Singh PW4 and narrated the occurrence to him. On 12.3.84, Badri Singh PW5 had gone to village Mansinghwala to have a round of his land which was under cultivation of his brother, Kartar Singh PW3. After having a round of the fields, he went to the house of his cousin, Pritam Kaur deceased and on reaching there, found the dead body of his cousin Pritam Kaur lying near the door of the residential room. It was covered with a chaddar. Badri Singh PW removed the chaddar from the face of the deceased could noticed some stiffness at the back of the neck. He became suspicious and immediately left for village Sandahwan to inform Harnam Singh - father of the deceased. Accompanied by Harnam Singh, Bhagwan Singh, Balwant Singh, Wazir Singh and some others he came back to village Mansinghwala and on reaching there, learnt that the dead body had already been removed for cremation. They all then went to the cremation ground, reaching there at about 2 p.m. The dead body was on the funeral pyre. Gurkukh Singh, Piara Singh, Sunder Singh, Kartar Singh, Dhan Singh and Ram Singh (accused) were feeding fire to the pyre. On seeing Badri Singh, Balwant Singh PWs and others, they all ran away leaving the dead body on the pyre and a tractor trolly nearby. The fire was extinguished and the half burnt dead body was removed from the pyre. Leaving Balwant Singh, Wazir Singh and Harnam Singh to take care of the dead body, Badri Singh PW5, accompanied by Sunder Singh PW went to report the incident to the police. When they both reached near Sadiq Chowk, Harbhagwan Singh SHO, Police Station, Sadiq met them. Badri Singh made a statement before him Ex. P5, which was sent by the SHO to the Police station and on the basis thereof a formal FIR Ex. P5/B was registered. SI Harbhagwan Singh PW 9 thereupon took up the investigation in hand and rushed to the cremation ground. He took possession of the dead body and after preparing an inquest report EX.P3 sent the dead body to Faridkot for post mortem examination. The autopsy on the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top