2005(1) Supreme 754
Supreme Court of India
(From Patna High Court)
Ashok Bhan & A.K. Mathur, JJ.
The Management of the Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. —Appellant
versus
Chief Inspecting Officer and Ors. —Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 37 of 1998
With
C.A.No. 2309 of 1999
Decided on 17-12-2004
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Kavita Dahiya, Ajay Aggarwal, Ms. Meghalee Barthakur and Rajan Narain, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Ashok Mathur, Arup Banerjee, Somnath Mukherjee, Advocate (N.P.), Nandini Mukherjee and D.P. Mukherjee, Advocates.
A. Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1954, Sections 2(6) and 40 - Bihar Shops and Establishments Rules, 1955, Rule 3 - Establishment - An Hospital employees and their families and dependent of the Company, and its associated companies namely - Appellant was also catering for the Government employees, on payment- Respondent sought registration of the Hospital as an establishment under Section 2(6) of the Act- Contention of the appellant that since it was providing medical service to its employees and its associated industries and it was not involved in the commercial activities, it is not an establishment, overruled by the authorities- The High Court upheld the order of the Authorities-Held it was evident that the Hospital was not being run for the employees of the appellant management or their associated industries only but it caters to the need of the Government servants as well as private patients and fee is charged from them- Therefore, the Hospital was doing business and it was not doing charity and was a part of it and was an 'establishment' under Section 2(6) of the Act- Order of High Court affirmed ( paras 11 to 14)
B. Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1954, Section 4(2) - Charitable institution - The appellant established an hospital for providing medical facilities to its employees claimed exemption from the E.S.I. Act being a charitable institution - plea not accepted- Even if the establishment was taking care of their employees, it is under statutory obligation of the appellant management otherwise they would have to make registration under Section 2A of the E. S. I. Act- The fact remains that the Hospital was not only catering for the employees but also the Government and private patients as well for which it was charging fee for the services rendered, it is irrelevant whether it is running for profit or loss. [Paras 12 and 14]
Judgment
A.K. Mathur, J.—Both these appeals raise common question of law, therefore they are disposed off by this common order.
Civil Appeal No. 37 of 1998
2. This appeal is directed against an order passed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court dated February 14, 1997 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court held that the Tata Main Hospital at Jamshedpur (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Hospital’) is an establishment within the meaning of Section 2(6) of the Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1953 (hereinafter to be referred to as the “Act”) and it is covered by the aforesaid Act. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order this appeal has been filed by the appellant.
3. Brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal are that the Hospital was established by the Management of Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd. in the year 1908 for providing medical facilities to the employees as well as their families and dependent of the Company, and its associated companies namely, TELCO, Tata Yodogawa, Tata Robin Fraser and their employees at Jamshedpur. It is also alleged that apart from catering for the employees of the appellant and its associated industries it also caters for the Government employees, on payment of charges about Rs. 50/- per day and from other private patients at the rate of Rs. 120/- per day. It is alleged that 75 of the patients treated are either employees of the appellant or its associated companies or family members of the employees of the appellant or its associated companies. 15 of the patients are Government employees and the rest 10 of the patients are outsiders. It is alleged that a letter was sent by the Labour Superintendent, Jamshedpur to the appellant on November 7, 1995 for registration of the Hospital as an establishment under the provisions of the Act. An objection was taken by the appellant to the effect that since it is providing medical service to its employees and its associated industries and it is not involved in the commercial activities, as such it is not an establishment within the meaning of the Act and it cannot be covered by the aforesaid Act. This objection was overruled by the authorities. Hence the present writ petition was filed.
4. The Division Bench of the Patna High Court after considering necessary provisions of the Act and the Rules framed there under affirmed the order of the authority and held that the establishment is covered by the Act. Hence the present appeal by way of special leave before this Court.
5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Principally two submissions have been made; (i) that the present Hospital does not fall within the definition of ‘establishment’ as defined in Section 2(6) of the Act and (ii) that under section 4(2) read with Schedule 1 of item No.2 it is a charitable hospital and therefore it is exempted under the aforesaid section.
6. Before we advert to the facts of the case, we may mention here that a statement of revenue and expenditure of the budget of the Medical Division has been furnished by the appellant and it has been pointed out that there is always deficit in the medical account under the Hospital head. It is also admitted position that the Hospital is one of the Divisions of the appellant. It has also given the details as to the numbers of patients of the appellant and its associated companies are taken care and number of Government servants and private patients are also being treated by the Hospital.
7. Intervenors have also filed a statement showing what are the charges effective from April 1, 2000 for non-entitled category of patients and it has been pointed out that admission charge of Rs. 75/- has been revised to Rs. 1000/-, charges in the general ward is Rs. 400/- per bed, VIP cabin is charged at Rs. 1250/- and ICU cabin charge is Rs. 2250/- per day. Likewise, the details for each of the medical speciality charges are being levied varying from Rs. 100/- to Rs. 1000/-. It is an admitted position that the Hospital is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.