SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 489

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI, N.L. UNTWALIA, V.D. TULZAPURKAR, R.S. PATHAK AND A.P. SEN, JJ.**
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat, Ahmedabad, Appellants
Versus
Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufactures Association, Surat, Respondent,
Tax reference Nos. 1A 1973 and 10-14 of 1975
Decided on 19-11-1979.
AND
Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-II, Ahmedabad, Appellant
Versus
Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufactures Association, Surat, Respondent.
Advocates appeared
Mr. V. S. Desai, Sr. Advocate (in T. R. No. 1A of 1973) (Mr. B. B. Ahuja and Miss A. Subhashini, Advocates with him), for Appellants; Mr. Sanat P. Mehta and M/s. Ravinder Narain, A.N. Haskar and Shri Narain, Advocates, for Respondents. For Interveners:
Dr. Devi Pal, Sr. Advocate (M/s P.V. Kapur, S.R. Agarwal, Praveen Kumar and R.K. Chaudhary, Advocates with him), for Indian Sugar Mills.
Dr. Devi Pal, Sr. Advocate (Mr. D.N. Gupta, advocate with him), for Bengal Chamber.
M/s. R.N. Bajoria, S.R. Agarwal and Praveen Kumar, Advocates for Indian Chamber, Calcutta.
Mr. F. S. Nariman, Sr. Advocate (M/s. N. Nettur, A.K. Sanghi and O.P.Vaish, Advocates with him), for Federation of Indian Chamber, New Delhi.
* R. A. Nos. 66 (AHD) of 1971-72 and R. A. Nos. 140-144 /AHD/ of 1973-74

Advocates:
A.K.Sanghi, A.N.HAKSAR, A.Subhashini, B.B.Ahuja, D.N.GUPTA, Devi Pal, DEVI PRASAD PAL, F.S.NARIMAN, N.Nettra, O.P.Vaish, P.V.KAPUR, PRAVEEN KUMAR, PRAVIN KUMAR, R.K.CHAUDHARY, R.M.BAJORIA, Ravindra Narayan, S.R.AGARWAL, Sanat P.Mehta, Shri Narain, V.S.DESAI

Headnote:

Income-tax Act, 1961 – Section 256 and 257 - Companies Act, 1956 – Section 25,11(1) and 2(15) - Trust - These tax references have been made by Tribunal directly to this Court under S. 257 of Income-tax Act, 1961, since there is a conflict of opinion amongst different High Courts as to interpretation of the words "not involving carrying on of any activity for profit" occurring at the end of the definition of charitable purpose in cl. (15) of Sec. 2 - Originally these references came up for hearing before a Bench of three Judges but having regard to great importance of question involved and serious repercussions, which an adverse decision might have on a large number of public trust in country, Bench thought it desirable to refer cases to a larger Bench and that is how these references have now come before court - Though references are six in number, they relate to same assessee and raise same question, only assessment years being different - Assessee is Silk Cloth Manufactures Association, a company incorporated under Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Original Memorandum of Association set out objects for which assessee was incorporated, but court are not concerned with it since vital amendments were made in Memorandum with effect at the time when the assessee was permitted under Section 25 of Companies Act, 1956 to omit word "limited" from its name by order of Central Government and it is amended Memorandum which governed assessee during relevant assessment years - Whether on facts and in circumstances of case, assessee is entitled to exemption under Section 11 (1) (a) of Income-tax Act, 1961 directly to this Court – Held, court also unable to endorse position that by permitting trust or institution to carry on an activity which brings in profit, although that activity is carried on in course of working out of the purpose of trust or institution, businessmen have a highroad to tax avoidance - It was apparently not brought to notice of the learned Judges that a carefully enacted scheme has been incorporated in Act which closely controls the utilisation of trust income, and that tax exemption is conditional on the observance of the statutory conditions stipulated in that scheme - On the facts of the present references which are set out in the judgment - Court have no hesitation in holding that purpose of respondent company falls within the definition of S. 2 (15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Sub-clause (a) of clause 3 of Memorandum of Association declares that purpose for which company has been established is to promote commerce and trade in Art Silk Yarn, Raw Silk, Cotton Yarn, Art Silk Cloth and Cotton Cloth - Promotion of commerce and trade has been held by this Court in Commr. of Income-tax v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce, (1965) 55 ITR 722 to be an object of general public utility, and there is nothing to show that, viewed as purpose for which the company was incorporated, sub-clause involves the carrying on of any activity for profit - Remaining sub-clauses enumerate the powers for which it has been constituted – Court answer the question referred in each of the reference in affirmative, in favour of assessee and against Revenue - Revenue will pay the costs of the assessee in two sets, one in Tax Reference and the other in Tax Reference Cases - Reference answered in affirmative.

JUDGMENT

BHAGWATI, J. (for himself and on behalf of N.L. Untwalia and V.D. Tulzapurkar, JJ.) (Majority view):- These tax references have been made by the Tribunal directly to this Court under S. 257 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), since there is a conflict of opinion amongst different High Courts as to the interpretation of the words "not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit" occurring at the end of the definition of charitable purpose in cl. (15) of Sec. 2. Originally these references came up for hearing before a Bench of three Judges but having regard to the great importance of the question involved and the serious repercussions, which an adverse decision might have on a large number of public trust in the country, the Bench thought it desirable to refer the cases to a larger Bench and that is how these references have now come before us.

2. Though the references are six in number, they relate to the same assessee and raise the same question, only the assessment years being different. The assessee is the Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufactures Association, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913. The original Memorandum of Association set out the objects for which the assessee was incorporated, but we are not concerned with it since vital amendments were made in the Memorandum with effect from 14th July, 1961 at the time when the assessee was permitted under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 to omit the word "limited" from its name by order of the Central Government and it is the amended Memorandum which governed the assessee during the relevant assessment years. The amended object, so far as material, were as follows:

(a) To promote commerce and trade in Art Silk Yarn, Raw Silk, Cotton Yarn, Art Silk Cloth, Silk Cloth and Cotton Cloth.

(b) To carry on all and any of the business of Art Silk Yarn, Raw Silk Cotton Yarn as well as Art Silk Cloth, Silk Cloth and Cotton Cloth belonging to and on behalf of the members.

(c) To obtain import Licences for import of Art Silk Yarn, Raw Silk, Cotton Yarn and other Raw Materials as well as accessories required by the members for the manufacture of Art Silk. Silk and Cotton Fabrics.

(d) To obtain Export Licences and export cloth manufactured by the members.

(e) To buy and sell and deal in all kinds of cloth and other goods and fabrics belonging to and on behalf of the members.

(f) to (m) x x x x

(n) To do all other lawful things as are incidental or conducive to the attainment of the above objects.

Clause 5 of the Memorandum provided in sub-clause (1) that the income and property of the assessee wheresoever derived shall be applied solely for the promotion of its objects as set forth in the Memorandum and sub-clause (2) directed that no portion of the income or property shall be paid or transferred, directly or indirectly, by way of dividend, bonus or otherwise by way of profit, to persons, who at any time are or have been members of the assessee or to anyone or more of them or to any person claiming through any one or more of them. What should happen to the assets in case of winding up or dissolution of the assessee, was set out in clause 10 of the Memorandum and it provided that the property remaining after satisfaction of all the debts and liabilities shall not be distributed amongst the members of the assessee but shall be given or transferred to such other company having the same objects as the assessee, to be determined by the members of the assessee at or before the time of the dissolution or in default, by the High Court of Judicature that has or may acquire jurisdiction in the matter. The income and property of the assessee were thus liable to be applied solely and exclusively for the promotion of the objects set out in the Memorandum and no part of such income or property could be distributed amongst the members in any form or under any guise orutilised for their benefit either during the operational existence of the as















































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top