SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 267

RUMA PAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Bradma Of India LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

Ruma Pal, J.—The respondent manufactures electronic cash registers. In addition to the usual functions of a cash register, the respondent’s models perform various other functions including: i) Billing and cash memo printing with alpha numeric print out ii) Cashier-wise cash collection summary and analysis. iii) Daily and periodical item-wise analysis iv) Stock analysis v) Re-order level analysis vii) Salesman-wise sales analysis; etc.

2. The question is whether such cash registers are classifiable under Entry 90 or under Entry 97(b) of Part II, Schedule (c) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

3. The two competing entries read as ­follows:—

Entry 90. “Tabulating calculating cash registering, indexing, card punching franking, addressing, cheque writing, statistical paper threading and data processing (other than computers) machines and components, parts and accessories of such machines.

Entry 97(a) “Computer and components parts and accessories thereof and tapes spools and tapes spools and discussed therewith and

(b) Electronic systems, instruments apparatus and appliances other than those specified elsewhere and components parts and accessories of any of them.”

4. The Departmental












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top