N.S.HEGDE, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, S.B.SINHA
Shakuntala Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kamla – Respondent
Judgment
Santosh Hegde, J.—Noticing certain contradictory views in three different judgments of this Court in Teg Singh vs. Charan Singh [(1977) 2 SCC 732], Kesar Singh vs. Sadhu [(1996) 7 SCC 711) and Balwant Singh vs. Daulat Singh [(1997) 7 SCC 137), a Division Bench of 2-Judges of this Court referred the instant appeals for disposal by a larger bench by its referral order dated 27th October, 2004, hence, this appeal is before us.
2. Brief facts giving rise to these appeals are as follows:
One Hirday Ram was the owner of the suit property. He had three wives, namely, Kubja, Pari and Uttamdassi. Kubja had pre-deceased Hirday Ram leaving behind a daughter named Tikami. During his life time, Hirday Ram made a Will dated 1.10.1938 whereby he bequeathed a part of his property to his daughter Tikami and the remaining property was given to his two other wives, named above, for their maintenance with the condition that they would not have the power to alienate the same in any manner. As per the Will, after the death of the above two wives of Hirday Ram, the property was to revert back to his daughter Tikami as absolute owner. After the death of Hirday Ram and his second wife Pari in 1939, t
Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of T.N. & Anr.
Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. L.V.A. Dixitulu & Ors.
Management of M/s. Sonepat Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Ajit Singh
V. Tulasamma v. V. Sesha Reddy
Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal & Ors. v. Dossibai N.B. Jeejeebhoy
Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad & Ors. v. B. Karunakar & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.