SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 243

N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA
Management Of Sonepat Coop. Sugar Mills LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Singh – Respondent


Judgment

S.B. Sinha, J.—These appeals are ­directed against the judgments and orders dated 04.09.2001 in L.P.A Nos. 1311 of 1991 and 1356 of 1991 and 7.3.2002 in L.P.A.No. 1356 of 1991 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.

Introductory Fact :

2. The Respondent herein was appointed by the Appellant in the post of Legal Assistant; the qualification wherefor was degree in law with a practicing licence. The nature of his duties was to prepare written statements and notices, recording enquiry proceedings, giving opinions to the Management, drafting, filling the pleadings and representing the Appellant in all types of cases, viz., civil, labour and arbitration references independently. He was also conducting departmental enquiries against the workmen employed in the industrial undertaking of the Appellant. He was placed on probation. While he was serving the Appellant in the said capacity, allegedly a decision was taken to abolish the said post pursuant to the recommendations of the Federation of Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd., as a result whereof his services were dispensed with.

3. An industrial dispute was raised by the Respondent which was eventually referred to the Labour Court























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top