SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 708

ASHOK BHAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
U. P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Agnihotri – Respondent


Judgment

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 10.03.2003 passed by the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in Second Appeal No. 334 of 1999 whereby the High Court allowed the second appeal filed by the respondent-herein.

3. Respondent was working as S.D.I. in the Education Department. As per his service book, his date of birth was 30.07.1941. The Governor using the powers under conditional part of Article 309 of the Constitution of India framed the following Notification. The notification dated 28.05.1974 reads thus :-

“State of U.P.

Niyukti Vibhag Anubhag-4

Notification

28th May, 1974

No. 41/269 Niyukti-4 Governor using the powers under conditional part of Article 309 of the Constitution of India, frames following Niyamawali:-

1. Short title an commencement (1) This Niyamawali will be called date of birth determination Niyamawali, 1974 for the purpose of appointment in service in U.P.

2. It shall be enforced at once.

(2) Exact date of birth or determination of Age of a Government servant the date of birth or determination of age of a Government servant which has been written in his High School Certificate or equ






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top