ASHOK BHAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
U. P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Agnihotri – Respondent
Judgment
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—Leave granted.
2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 10.03.2003 passed by the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in Second Appeal No. 334 of 1999 whereby the High Court allowed the second appeal filed by the respondent-herein.
3. Respondent was working as S.D.I. in the Education Department. As per his service book, his date of birth was 30.07.1941. The Governor using the powers under conditional part of Article 309 of the Constitution of India framed the following Notification. The notification dated 28.05.1974 reads thus :-
“State of U.P.
Niyukti Vibhag Anubhag-4
Notification
28th May, 1974
No. 41/269 Niyukti-4 Governor using the powers under conditional part of Article 309 of the Constitution of India, frames following Niyamawali:-
1. Short title an commencement (1) This Niyamawali will be called date of birth determination Niyamawali, 1974 for the purpose of appointment in service in U.P.
2. It shall be enforced at once.
(2) Exact date of birth or determination of Age of a Government servant the date of birth or determination of age of a Government servant which has been written in his High School Certificate or equ
Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. Dinabandhu Majumdar & Anr.
Executive Engineer, Bhadrak (R&B) Division, Orissa & Ors. v. Rangadhar Mallik
The Secretary & Commissioner Home Department & Ors. v. R. Kirubakaran
State of U.P. & Ors. v. Gulaichi (Smt.)
State of T.N. v. T.V. Venugopalan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.