B.N.SRIKRISHNA, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Hari Rao – Appellant
Versus
N. Govindachari – Respondent
Judgment
P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.—Leave granted.
2. A room in a building in Thousand Lights, Mount Road Madras, is the subject matter of this proceeding. The respondent-landlord leased that room, a ‘building’ as defined in the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 to the appellant. According to the landlord, the letting was for the purpose of a shoe trade or trade in leather goods by the tenant. There was a prior proceeding in which there was a compromise and the building was re-let to the tenant after it was re-modeled or re-constructed. While carrying on his business, the tenant had used a part of the premises for carrying on a trade in readymade garments and that amounted to a user of the building by the tenant for a purpose other than that for which it was leased, within the meaning of Section 10 (2) (ii) (b) of the Act. The tenant had also fixed name-boards outside and drilled two holes in the walls for fixing racks for the purpose of his trade and had taken an independent three phase electric connection and for that purpose he had made holes on the floor and on the wall; that these acts of the tenant amount to commission or causing the commission of such acts
G. Arunachalam (died) through L.Rs. and Anr. v. Thondarperienambi and Anr.
Dashrath Baburao Sangale & Others v. Kashimath Bhaskar Data
Ram Gopal v. Jai Narain and others
M. Arul Jothi & Anr. v. Lajja Bal (Deceased) and Anr.
M.K. Palanippa Chettiar v. A. Pennuswami Pillai
Malpe Vishwanath Acharya and others v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
British Motor Car Co. v. Madan Lal Saggi (Dead) and Anr.
Gurbachan Singh v. Shivalak Rubber Industries
Vipin Kumar v. Roshan Lal Anand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.