RUMA PAL, H.K.SEMA
Ponni Sugars (Erode), LTD. – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer – Respondent
Judgment
Ruma Pal, J.—The appellant has a sugar mill and purchases sugarcane from cane growers. An agreement was entered into between the appellant and the cane growers. In terms of the agreement, the appellant arranges transport of the sugarcane from the fields to the appellant’s mill. The question is whether the transport charges are excludible from the taxable turnover of the appellant for the purpose of purchase tax under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959?
2. The assessment years in question are 1987-88 and 1988-89. During this period, the agreement for sale and purchase of sugar which was entered into between the appellant and the cane growers (where the appellant is referred as ‘the first party’ and the cane growers as ‘the second party’) provided inter alia:
1) Both the parties agree to act according to the provisions of Madras Sugar Factory Control Rules, 1949, Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1996 and the orders of Tamil Nadu Government Agricultural (Cane) Department and the Director of Sugar/Cane Commissioner of Tamil Nadu
2) The Second Party agrees to sell the entire cane planted/to be planted in the land specified in the schedule to this agreement to the first party for
Kallakurichi Co operative Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu
State of Tamil Nadu v. Madurantakam Cooperative Sugar Mills
Ugar Sugar Works Ltd. v. Deputy Commission of Commercial Taxes
Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. M/s. Rai Bharat Das & Bros.
E.I.D. Parry (I) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions Federations v. West U.P. Sugar Mills and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.