SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 542

M.H.KANIA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rai Bharat Das And Brothers – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, S.C.Manchanda

JUDGMENT

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.:— This is an appeal by leave from the judgment and order of the High Court of Allahabad, dated 12th July, 1982.* The decision was rendered in a revision by the assessee which was directed against the order of the Sales Tax Tribunal. The year involved is the assessment year 1974-75.

* Reported in (1982) 5 STL 233.

2. The assessee carried on the business of mining and sale of silica sand. The question was whether the sales tax could be charged from the assessee in respect of packing charges received by the assessee from the purchaser. The sales tax authorities as well as the Tribunal held that the assessee was liable to pay sales tax on the packing charges that he had received from the purchaser. From the facts found by the Tribunal it appears that there was a contract for packing the silica sand in gunny bags and packing charges had been realised on the basis of mt. tons though these were separately shown and were added up with the price of the silica sand and on the total sales tax was charged.

3. Section 2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter called the Act) provides as follows :-

" "sale price" means the amount payable to a dealer as c












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top