SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1585

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, S.B.SINHA
Income Tax Officer, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Induflex Products (P) LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

S.B. Sinha, J.—Leave granted.

2. The Respondent is an assessee of Income Tax. It is engaged in the business of export. It claimed benefit of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). A declaration was made by it that its profits out of export of trading goods were ‘negative’ i.e. it incurred loss. The said benefit having been allowed by the assessing officer while making assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax in exercise of his power conferred upon him under Section 263 thereof issued a notice to the assessee on the premise that the said order of assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Upon hearing the assessee, by an order dated 3.3.1999, a direction was issued to the assessing officer to withdraw the said relief. The Respondent preferred an appeal thereagainst before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. By an order dated 19.8.2002, the said appeal was allowed following a decision of Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of A.M. Mossa Vs. CIT in ITA No. 498/Coch/1995. The appeal was preferred by the Appellant herein before the High Court in terms of Section 260A of the Act. The substantial question of law r































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top