Income Tax Officer, Bangalore vs Induflex Products (P) LTD.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2005 Supreme(SC) 1585

2005(8) Supreme 503
Supreme Court of India
(From Karnataka High Court)
S.B. Sinha & R.V. Raveendran, JJ.
Income Tax Officer, Bangalore —Appellant
versus
M/s. Induflex Products (P) Ltd. —Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 7307 of 2005
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 12334 of 2004)
Decided on 8-12-2005
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, Additional Solicitor General, T.V. Ratnam and B.V. Balaram Das, Advocates.

Headnote:Income Tax Act, 1961—Section 80HHC—Profits derived from export of goods which would be subject matter of exemption—Profit must be out of the business carried on by assessee—"Profit” used in the provision connotes positive profit earned from said business alone which could be the subject matter of exemption—If profit is not earned, question of claiming exemption would not arise—Respondent assessee declared “negative” profit out of export of trading goods—Assessing officer allowed the benefit—Commissioner of Income Tax in exercise of power u/s 263 of the Act after show cause and hearing to assessee directed assessing officer to withdraw the said relief—Tribunal allowed the appeal of assessee —High Court dismissed appeal in limine—Appeal—Term “profit” implies positive profit which has to be arrived at after taking into consideration the profit earned from export of both self manufactured goods and trading goods and profits and losses in both trades have to be taken into consideration—All those aspects were not examined by High Court—Matter needed to be remanded.
       Held : The aforementioned provision was brought in the statute book for the purpose of providing incentive to export houses but the same would not meant that even if the assessee incurs a loss instead of profit, he would be entitled to the benefit thereof. From a perusal of the aforementioned provision, it is evident that the profits derived from the export of goods which would be subject-matter of exemption thereunder must be the profits out of the business carried on by the assessee. The expression “profits” used in the aforementioned provision connotes positive profit. It is a profit earned from the said business alone which can be the subject-matter of exemption. A fortiori if a profit is not earned, the question of claiming exemption would not arise. (Paras 5 and 6)
       IPCA Laboratory (supra) is an authority for the proposition that adjusted profit of business would be a profit as reduced by the profit derived from business of exports out of India of trading goods. It is no doubt true that the term ‘profit’ implies positive profit which has to be arrived at after taking into consideration the profit earned from export of both self-manufactured goods and the trading goods and the profits and losses in both the trades have, thus, to be taken into consideration. In the event, if it is found that a loss has occurred, sub-section (3) of Section 8-HHC will have no application. However, it does not appear from the records as to whether such an exercise was undertaken or not. The Appellants themselves in the list of dates averred that for the assessment year 1994-95, the Respondent had earned profit in its export business. Yet again in the order dated 03.03.1999 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax, the contention of the assessee was noticed in the following terms:
       “The learned Counsel for the assessee who appeared on the appointed day, contended that, though the assessee earned export profit, it resulted in the negative figure owing to the provisions in Sec. 80 HHC(3); that, in such a situation, the profit should be taken at Nil and relief should be allowed having regard to the export incentives (viz., advance licences); that as section 80HHC is benefit giving section it should be liberally construed; that the Appellate Tribunal in the case of A.M. Mossa Vs. CIT ITAT Cochin Bench ITA No. 498/Coch/1995, support this view, and that the assessment order is not erroneous.”
       It may, therefore, be necessary, in our opinion, to consider this aspect of the matter as to whether the Appellant had shown any positive profit or not as such clear finding does not appear to have been arrived at by the High Court. (Paras 8 to 11)

Judgment

S.B. Sinha, J.—Leave granted.

2. The Respondent is an assessee of Income Tax. It is engaged in the business of export. It claimed benefit of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). A declaration was made by it that its profits out of export of trading goods were ‘negative’ i.e. it incurred loss. The said benefit having been allowed by the assessing officer while making assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax in exercise of his power conferred upon him under Section 263 thereof issued a notice to the assessee on the premise that the said order of assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Upon hearing the assessee, by an order dated 3.3.1999, a direction was issued to the assessing officer to withdraw the said relief. The Respondent preferred an appeal thereagainst before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. By an order dated 19.8.2002, the said appeal was allowed following a decision of Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of A.M. Mossa Vs. CIT in ITA No. 498/Coch/1995. The appeal was preferred by the Appellant herein before the High Court in terms of Section 260A of the Act. The substantial question of law raised in the said appeal was as under:

“Whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in allowing the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act to the assessee Company in spite of not fulfilling the pre-condition which is mandatory in order to obtain such deduction?”

3. The Appeal was dismissed in limine by the High Court. The Appellant is, thus, in appeal before us.

4. Sub-section (1) and sub-section (3) of Section 80HHC reads as under:

“(1) Where an assessee, being an Indian company or a person (other than a company) resident in India, is engaged in the business of export out of India of any goods or merchandise to which this section applies, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, a deduction to the extent of profits, referred to in sub-section (1B), derived by the assessee from the export of such goods or merchandise.

Provided that if the assessee, being a holder of an Export House Certificate or a Trading House Certificate (hereafter in this section referred to as an Export House or a Trading House, as the case may be,) issues a certificate referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (4A), that in respect of the amount of the export turnover specified therein, the deduction under this sub-section is to be allowed to a supporting manufacturer, then the amount of deduction in the case of the assessee shall be reduced by such amount which bears to the total profits derived by the assessee from the export of trading goods, the same proportion as the amount of export turnover specified in the said certificate bears to the total export turnover of the assessee in respect of such trading goods.”

*** *** ***

“(3) For the purposes of sub-section (1),

(a) where the export out of India is of goods or merchandise manufactured or processed by the assessee, the profits derived from such export shall be the amount which bears to the profits of the business, the same proportion as the export turnover in respect of such goods bears to the total turnover of the business carried on by the assessee;

(b) where the export out of India is of trading goods, the profits derived from such export shall be the export turnover in respect of such trading goods as reduced by the direct costs and indirect costs attributable to such export;

(c) where the export out of India is of goods or merchandise manufactured or processed by the assessee and of trading goods, the profits derived from such export shall,—

(i) in respect of the goods or merchandise manufactured or processed by the assessee, be the amount which bears to the adjusted profits of the business, the same proportion as the adjusted export turnover in respect of such goods bears to the adjusted total

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2005 Supreme(SC) 1585

Cases Referred (1)