SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 685

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Durgacharan Misra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.PANDEY, J.R.DAS, R.K.GARG, VINU BHAGAT

Judgement

JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:- This is a petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the list of candidates prepared by Orissa Public Service Commission, Cuttack for appointment as Probationary Munsifs in the State Judicial Service.

2. The Selection of candidates for subordinate judicial service is governed by the Orissa Judicial Service Rules, 1964 (the "Rules"). The Rules were framed under the proviso to Article 309 read with Article 234 of the Constitution of India. The State Public Service Commission (The "Commission") is the selecting authority. The candidates are required to be selected by written test followed by viva voce test. The written examination carries the maximum marks of 950 and the viva voce test 200.

3. In accordance with the Rules, the Commission issued advertisement No. 12 of 1982-83 inviting applications from eligible candidates for posts of Probationary Munsifs. The petitioner was one of the candidates who applied in response thereof, In the written examination conducted by the Commission the petitioner secured 470 marks. He was called for viva voce test in which he was given 30 marks. He thus secured in all 500 out of 1150. The Com



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top