Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., P.N. BHAGWATI, AMARENDRA NATH SEN AND V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, JJ.
Civil Appeals Nos. 10160, 10161 and 10162 of 1983, D/- 1-5-1985.
Ashok Kumar Yadav and others etc. etc., Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana and others etc. etc. , Respondents.
AND
State of Haryana and another, Appellants
versus
Subhash Chander Sharma and others, Respondents.
AND
D.R. Chaudhary, Member and others, Appellants
Versus
Ashok Kumar Yadav and others Respondents.
Constitution of India – Articles 233 , 319 , 316 - Punjab Civil Service Rules, 1930 - Rule 9 - Rule 10 – Charity - Public Service - Appeals by special leave are directed against a judgment of Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court quashing and setting aside certain selections made by Haryana Public Service Commission to Haryana Civil Service and other allied services - Judgment in part proceeds on surmises and conjectures and has made certain uncharitable observations against Chairman and Members of Haryana Public Service Commission without any warrant and hence it is necessary to set out facts giving rise to appeals in some detail – Held , Court would also like to point out that in some of States, and State of Haryana is one of them, practice followed is to invite a retired Judge of High Court as an expert when selections for recruitment to Judicial Service of State are being made and advice given by such retired High Court Judge who participates in viva voce test as an expert is sometimes ignored by Chairman and members of Public Service Commission - This practice is in our opinion undesirable and does not commend itself to us - When selections for Judicial Service of State are being made, it is necessary to exercise utmost care to see that competent and able persons possessing a high degree of rectitude and integrity are selected, because if Court do not have good, competent and honest Judges, democratic polity of State itself will be in serious peril - It is therefore essential that when selections to Judicial Service are being made, a sitting Judge of High Court to be nominated by Chief Justice of State should be invited to participate in interview as an expert and since such sitting Judge comes as an expert who, by reason of fact that he is a sitting High Court Judge, knows quality and character of candidates appearing for interview, advice given by him should ordinarily be accepted, unless there are strong and cogent reasons for not accepting such advice and such strong and cogent reasons must be recorded in writing by Chairman and members of Public Service Commission - Court are giving this direction to Public Service Commission in every State because Court are anxious that finest talent should be recruited in Judicial Service and that can be secured only by having a real expert whose advice constitutes a determinative factor in selection process – Appeals allow
Judgment
BHAGWATI, J.:- These appeals by special leave are directed against a judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashing and setting aside certain selections made by the Haryana Public Service Commission to the Haryana Civil Service (Executive) and other allied services. The judgment in part proceeds on surmises and conjectures and has made certain uncharitable observations against the Chairman and Members of the Haryana Public Service Commission without any warrant and hence it is necessary to set out the facts giving rise to the appeals in some detail.
2. Sometime in October 1980 the Haryana Public Service Commission invited applications for recruitment to 61 posts in Haryana Civil Service (Executive) and other allied Services. The procedure for recruitment was governed by the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1930 as applicable in the State of Haryana, Rule 9, Clause (1) of these Rules provided that a competitive examination shall be held at any place in Haryana in each year in or about the month of January for the purpose of selection by competition of as many candidates for the Haryana Civil Service (Executive) and other allied services as the Governor of Haryana may determine and such competitive examination shall be held in accordance with the Regulations contained in Appendix I to the Rules. Rule 10 laid down the conditions for eligibility to appear at the competitive examination but we are not concerned with these conditions of eligibility in the present appeals, Regulation I in Appendix I provided that the competitive examination shall include compulsory and optional subjects and every candidate shall take all the compulsory subjects and not more than three of the optional subjects, provided that ex-servicemen shall not be required to appear in the optional subjects. The compulsory subjects included English Essay, Hindi, Hindi Essay and General Knowledge carrying in the aggregate 400 marks and there was also viva voce examination which was compulsory and which carried 200 marks and each optional subject carried 100 marks. Vide Regulation 5. The result was that the written examination carried an aggregate of 700 marks for candidates in general and for ex-serviceman, it carried an aggregate of 400 marks while in case of both, the viva voce examination carried 200 marks. Some argument has been turned on the true interpretation of Regulation 3 and hence it would be desirable to set it out in extenso. It reads as follows :
"3. No candidate shall be eligible to appear in the viva voce test unless he obtains 45 per cent marks in the aggregate of all subjects including at least 33 per cent marks in each of the language papers in Hindi (in Devnagri Script) and Hindi Essay provided that if at any examination a sufficient number of candidates do not obtain 45 per cent marks in the aggregate the Commission may at their discretion lower this percentage to not below 40 per cent for the language papers remaining unchanged."
It appears that in response to the advertisement issued by the Haryana Public Service Commission, about 6000 candidates applied for recruitment and appeared at the written examination held by the Haryana Public Service Commission. Out of about 6000 candidates who appeared for the written examination, over 1300 obtained more than 45 marks and thus qualified for being called for interview for the viva voce examination. The Haryana Public Service Commission invited all the 1300 and more candidates who qualified for the viva voce test, for interview and the interviews lasted for almost half a year. It seems that though originally applications were invited for recruitment to 61 posts, the number of vacancies rose during the time take up in the written examination and the viva voce test and ultimately 119 posts became available for being filled and on the basis of total marks obtained in the written examination as well as viva voce test, 119 candidates were selected and rec
referred to : A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
affirmed : Javid Rasool Bhat v. State of JandK
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.