SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 297

R.S.BACHAWAT, S.M.SIKRI
Badri Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


S.M.SIKRI, J.

(1) THIS appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree of the Madhya Pradesh High court allowing the appeal of the State of Madhya Pradesh ana dismissing the suit brought by the appellant, Badri Prasad - hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff.

(2) THE relevant facts for determining the points raised before us are these. On 27/12/1950, a contract was entered into between Kumar Bharat, Shah, minor, through his guardian, and the plaintiff, in respect of forests in Mouza Sunderpani Jagir. The terms were reduced to writing and an agreement was signed on 21/01/1951. It is necessary to reproduce the agreement in extenso as it would be necessary to interpret it carefully.

"DEED of agreement executed by Shri Kumar Bharat Shah minor, guardian Shrimati Rani Umarkuar Sahiba, Jagirdar of Mouza Sunderpani.

CONDITIONS of contract, area, forest, Mouza Sunderpani.

(1) Out of the area of 1704.46 acres of Mouza Sunderpani Jagir contract of all the teak trees of more than 12 inches girth standing in the 1000 acres of the forest of big trees and excluding those teak trees wnich have girth upto 12 inches is given to contractor Badri Prasad M



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top