M. HIDAYATULLAH, S. R. DASS, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. WANCHOO, S. K. DAS
Mahadeo, Seth Bansidhar, Amarsibhai, Sambashiv, Firm Habib Ahmed Brothers, Hirjibhai, Firm S. Pratap And Company, Kumar S. Pratap Singh And Company, R. M. Chandrapal Singh Rana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent
Judgment
M. HIDAYATULLAH J.: The judgment in Petition No. 12 of 1957 shall also dispose of Petitions Nos. 26 and 27 of 1954, 24 and 437 of 1955, 256 of 1956 and 16, 17 and 73 of 1957.
2. These petitions under Art. 32 arise out of alleged agreements by which some of the proprietors in the former State of Madhya Pradesh granted to one or other of the petitioners the right to take forest produce, mainly tendu leaves, from the forests included in Zamindari and Malguzari villages of the grantors. Government has disclaimed these agreements and auctioned the rights afresh. The petitioners state that this is an invasion of their fundamental rights. The dates on which these alleged agreements were entered into the terms therefor and the periods during which they were to subsist are different from case to case. It is not necessary in this judgment to recite the terms of these documents, and it is sufficient to group them for purpose of decision on the basis whether the said agreements still subsist, and whether they are incorporated in a registered instrument or not.
3. Petitions Nos. 437 of 1955 and 256 of 1956 are founded on unregistered documents. The answering respondent does not admit thes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.