Toshiba Anand Lamp vs Verghes - 1987 Supreme(SC) 500

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1987 Supreme(SC) 500

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.B.Eradi : V.Khalid
Toshiba Anand Lamp
Versus
Verghes
Case No. : 722 , 735 of 1974
Date of Decision : 5/6/87
Advocates Appeared: Goswami Lira : Mishra D.N. : Namboodiry M.K.D. : Pal G.P. : Pillai P.K. : Sukumaran S.

Advocates:
D.N.Mishra, G.P.Pal, LIRA GOSVAMI, M.K.D.NAMBUDIRY, P.K.PALLI, S.SUKUMARAN

Headnote:
Constitution of India,1950 - No locus standi to maintain - Judgment and order of high court is accordingly set aside and matter is remanded to the high court for being restored to file and disposal on merits - Parties are to bear their respective costs – Held, In view of decision of this court in himalayan tiles & marbles (p) ltd (dead) by l.rs. & ors - SCR it is not possible to sustain view taken by the High court that appellant herein had no locus standi to maintain the appeal before the High court - Appeals are disposed of accordingly

(1) IN view of the decision of this court in HIMALAYAN TILES & MARBLES (P) LTD. V. FANCIS VICTOR COUINHO (DEAD) BY L.RS. & ORS. 1980 (3) SCR 235, it is not possible to sustain the view taken by the High court that the appellant herein had no locus standi to maintain the appeal before the High court. The judgment and order of the High court is accordingly set aside and the matter is remanded to the High court for being restored to file and disposal on merits. The parties are to bear their respective costs.

(2) THE appeals are disposed of accordingly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document