SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 99

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, N.D.OJHA
S. S. Rathore – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


(1) THE question involved in this case is one of limitation. The appellant was dismissed from service by the Additional Collector of Betul, State of Madhya Pradesh on 13/01/1966. He preferred a statutory appeal under the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956. The said appeal was dismissed on 31/08/1966. Thereafter he instituted a suit after issuing a notice as required by law to the State government under S. 80 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. The suit was filed on September 30, 1969. It is not disputed that if the period of limitation is calculated from the date of dismissal of the appeal the suit would be in time, under the relevant article of Limitation Act. But if the period of limitation has to be calculated from the date of the original order of dismissal the suit would be out of time. In the present case the suit was dismissed by the trial court on the ground of limitation, and it has been affirmed by the first appellate court and by the High court in second appeal. The High court, while dismissing the appeal, relied upon a decision of this court in Situ Ram Goel v. Municipal Board, Kanpur which was a decision rendered by fi




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top