SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 636

A.M.AHMADI, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
H. B. Gandhi, Excise And Taxation Officer Cum Assessing Authority, Karnal – Appellant
Versus
Gopinath And Sons – Respondent


(1) SPECIAL leave is granted.

(2) THESE appeals are by the Revenue and are directed against the order dated 20/05/1983 of the division bench of the High court of Punjab and Haryana in L.P.A. Nos. 444 and 445 of 1982 dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant against and affirming the orders dated 13/01/1983 of the learned Single Judge in Civil Writ Petition Nos. 2054 and 2170 of 1982. By those writ petitions, the respondents assailed orders of assessment to sales tax under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 bringing to tax a turnover of sales of articles of food said to have been sold by the respondents in their restaurants.

(3) AGAINST the respective orders of assessment the respondents filed appeals provided for in the statute. Section 39(5) of the Act contemplates that no appeal shall be entertained unless it is filed within sixty days from the date of the order appealed against and the appellate authority is satisfied that the amount of tax assessed has been paid. The proviso to that sub-section, however, invests the appellate authority with the discretion to waive the requirement of the payment of tax as a precondition to the entertainability o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top