SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 596

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, N.D.OJHA, R.M.SAHAI
Malayammal – Appellant
Versus
A. Malayalam Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
A.T.M.SAMPATH, LILY ISABLE THOMAS, P.N.Ramalingam

Judgment

JAGANNATHA SHEITY, J.

(1) THIS is an appeal from the judgment and decree of the Madras High court and it arises out of a suit for partition and possession of certain properties.

(2) THE facts leading to the institution of the suit are as follows: On 3/03/1942, one Karuppanna Pillai (hereinafter referred to as "testator") executed his last will and testament Ex. B-l. Thereunder he disposed of all his properties described in five schedules A, B, C, D and E. He directed that the properties under A, B and C schedules shall be respectively taken and be in the possession of the defendant, the first plaintiff and the second plaintiff. In respect of E schedule properties, he has made a bequest creating an endowment that after his lifetime, it should be managed for the purpose and in the manner mentioned therein. The dispute in the suit was as to the validity of the endowment. One Palaniammal and Chellammal are the sisters of the plaintiffs and the defendant. The testator created a life estate in favour of those sisters in respect of D schedule properties with a direction that after their lifetime the properties shall be dealt with in the same manner as
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top