SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 684

R.M.SAHAI, S.R.PANDIAN
Indian Airlines Corporation – Appellant
Versus
K. C. Shukla – Respondent


Advocates:
ARUN JAITLEY, G.RAMASVAMY, NINA GUPTA, S.L.HANS, SANGITA CHAUDHARY

Judgment

R.M. SAHAI, J.

(1) INDIAN Airlines is aggrieved by the order of the Delhi High court passed in exercise of its writ jurisdiction quashing the order dated 10/04/1990, promoting respondents 2 to 25 as illegal and in the alternative directing the Corporation to promote the appellant to the post of Deputy Operations Manager with effect from the date the other respondents were promoted and grant all consequential benefits. Reasons for such directions were both legal and factual. It was found that the post of Deputy Operations Manager was mere redesignation of the earlier post of Chief Pilot therefore the respondent was entitled to claim promotion on his Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and entire procedure of selection on ACR and interview was contrary to rules. Selection was found to be vitiated as the committee was not constituted in accordance with rules and regulations. Method of evaluation based 50 per cent on ACR and 50 per cent on interview, when the field of eligibility comprised officers immediately below, was held to be arbitrary as such wide gap between ACR evaluation and personality test was liable to reduce entire selection process to a farce






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top