SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 539

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Tej Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
ARUNESHVAR GUPTA, K.S.BHATT, RAJENDRA SINGHVI, SURYA KANT SHARMA

ORDER

1. The appellant while being a Gram Sewak had applied for and was assigned on 18-11-1968, 5 bighas of land in Khasra No. 106 of Village Ramakhera, Tehsil Nimbahera under Rajasthan Colonisation (Medium & Minor Irrigation Projects Government Lands Allotment) Rules, 1968, for short the Rules. By proceedings dated 20-6-1980, the Additional Collector, Chittorgarh, cancelled the allotment on the ground that the appellant had concealed the fact that he was working as a Gram Sewak at the time of application and allotment and that he was not a bona fide agriculturist and he is not a landless person. On appeal it was confirmed and in second appeal Board of Revenue confirmed the same. The appellant filed the Writ Petition No. 2394 of 1990. The Division Bench by order dated 12-7-1990 dismissed the same. Thus, this appeal by special leave. It is not disputed that a person who wants to obtain allotment of land under the Rules must be a landless person.

2. Rule 3 (vi-A) defines "landless person" as :

"Landless person means a resident of Rajasthan who is either a bona fide agriculturist or an agricultural labourer, cultivating or likely to cultivate the land personally and whose main source









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top