A. M. AHMADI, K. S. PARIPOORNAN, SUHAS C. SEN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
A. Sanyasi Rao – Respondent
Judgement
PARIPOORNAN, J. :- In this batch of cases - writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and civil appeals and special leave petitions filed under Article 136 of the Constitution of India - substantially similar questions arise for consideration. The matter arise under the Incometax Act, 1961. The validity of Sections 44AC and 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is posed for consideration. Various assessees challenged the aforesaid provisions as ultra vires and beyond legislative competence and also violative of Articles 14 and 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India in a few High Courts. Substantially, the challenge was not accepted by all the High Courts. A few High Courts have read down the provisions of Section 44AC of the Act. Dissatisfied by the same, the assessee have come up in appeal. Feeling aggrieved by the reading down of Section 44AC of the Act, the Union of India has come up in appeals. Those are covered by civil appeals. Certain other assessees have challenged the aforesaid provisions directly under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Those are covered by writ petitions. A few assessees, feeling agg
relied on : Navnit Lal C. Javeri v. K.K. Sen
Anglo-French Textile Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Khandige Sham Bhat v. Agricultural ITO
Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
Twyford Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala
East India Tobacco Co. v. State of A.P
Ganga Sugar Corpn. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
considered : Raja Jagannath Baksh Singh v. State of U.P.
East India Tobacco Co. v. State of a.P.
Kunnatlwt Thathunni Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
referred to : Murthy Match Works v. CCE
considered : Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
referred to : E.P. Royappa v. State of T.N.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Ajay Hasia v. KhalidMujib Sehravardi
referred to : Sri Ram Ram Narain Medhi v. State of Bombay
ferred to : Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of W.B.
referred to : Banarasi Doss v. WTO
Baldeo Singh v. Commissioner of Income Tax
relied on : Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
referred to : Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia v. Union of India
Navinchandra Mafatlal v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Bhagwan Dass Jain v. Union of India
Baldeo Singh v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Navnit Lal C. Javeri v. K.K. Sen
relied on : Navnit Lal C. Javeri v. K.K. Sen
Anglo-French Textile Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Khandige Sham Bhat v. Agricultural ITO
Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
Twyford Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala
East India Tobacco Co. v. State of A.P
Ganga Sugar Corpn. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
considered : Raja Jagannath Baksh Singh v. State of U.P.
East India Tobacco Co. v. State of a.P.
Kunnatlwt Thathunni Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
referred to : Murthy Match Works v. CCE
considered : Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
referred to : E.P. Royappa v. State of T.N.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.