J. M. SHELAT, A. N. RAY, I. D. DUA, S. C. ROY, D. G. PALEKAR, G. K. MITTER, S. M. SIKRI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Harbhajan Singh Dhillon – Respondent
Judgement
SIKRI, C.J.I. (with Roy and Palekar JJ.): This appeal is from the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Writ No. 2291 of 1970 which was heard by a Bench of five Judges. Four Judges held that S.24 of the Finance Act, 1969 in so far as it amended the relevant provisions of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, was beyond the legislative competence of Parliament. Pandit, J., however, held that the impugned Act was intra vires the legislative powers of Parliament. The High Court accordingly issued a direction to the effect that the Wealth Tax Act, as amended by Finance Act, 1969 in so far as it includes the capital value of the agricultural land for the purposes of computing net wealth, was ultra vires the Constitution of India.
2. We may mention that the majority also held that the impugned Act was not a law with respect to entry 49 List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution; in other words, it held that this tax was not covered by entry 49 List II of the Seventh Schedule.
3. The Wealth Tax Act, 1957, was amended by Finance Act, 1969, to include the capital value of agricultural land for the purposes of computing net wealth. "Assets" is defined in S.2(e) to inc
referred to : Atiabari Tea Co v. State of Assam
Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) v. State of Rajasthan
Gift Tax Officer v. D. H. Nazerth
distinguished : Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel v. Union of India
State of Bombay v. Chamarbugwala
followed : Sudhir Chandra Nawn v. Wealth-tax Officer, Calcutta
relied on : Gift Tax Officer v. Nazarth
explained : Assisiant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax v. The Buckingham and Carnatic Co Ltd
relied on : State of Bombay v. Narothamdas Jethabhai
referred to : S C Nawn v. Wealin Tax Officer
Asstt Commissioner v. B and C Ltd
Prithvi Mills v. Broach Municipality
Patel Gordhandas Hargobindas v. Municipal Commissioner Ahmedabad
Shri Prithvi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Broach Borough Municipality
relied on : Sudhir Chandra Nawn v. Wealth Tax Officer Calcutta
Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax and Others v. The Buckingham and Carnatic Co ltd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.