SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 467

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Pradipgogoi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


ORDER

1. It is distressing to note a common feature that after making advertisement and recruitment conducted, the vacancies that arose thereafter though existing, no action was being taken to have them notified through the Public Service Commission and recruitment made so that all the eligible candidates would have opportunity to apply for recruitment as per the rules and their claim considered. The story is repeated in this case. Though advertisement was made in 1991, on 19-11-1993, after select list was prepared, appointments were made, but vacancies existing thereafter could not be filled in. Consequentially people, including the petitioners, had approached the High Court for their appointment. The High Court, following the judgment of this Court reported in State of Bihar v. Secretariat Asstt. Successful Examines Union 1986 ((1987) 1 SCC 378 : AIR 1987 SC 579) has directed to fill up the vacancies existing up to the date of recommendation by the Public Service Commission from the waiting list. Preparation of waiting list became a spinning ground for corruption and denial of constitutional right to equality to eligible candidates awaiting recruitment. It has become an endemic s



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top