S.B.MAJMUDAR, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Mahesh Chand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Raj Sharma – Respondent
ORDER
B. P. Jevvan Reddy, J.
1. Third defendant is the appellant. He along with Defendants Nos. 4 and 5 is the alienee of the house properly, which is the subject-matter of these appeals. Second defen-dant is the brother of third defendant and father of Defendants Nos. 4 and 5. Defendants Nos. 2, 4 and 5 are figuring as respondents in these appeals but are supporting the third defendant.
2. Plaintiff and defendants Nos. 6 to 8 are the daughters of late Ram Nath Dewan while the first defendant is the son of Ram Nath Dewan. First defendant and second defendant have married sis-ters. First defendant was practically settled in U.S.A. along with his family. He appointed the second defendant as his General Power of Attorney. Acting as the General Power of Attorney of first defendant, the second defendant executed a sale deed in respect of No. 5, Doctors Lane. New Delhi (the house property which is the subject-matter of these appeals, which shall be referred to hereinafter as "Doctors Lane") in favour of his brother (defendant No. 3) and sons (defendant Nos. 4 and 5).
3. The plaintiff, daughter of late Ram Nath is seeking to avoid the sale of the said house property in the present suit for pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.