SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 253

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.SARKARIA
N. Krishnammal – Appellant
Versus
R. Ekambaram – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.AGRAWAL, M.NATESAN, P.G.GOKHALE, S.GOPALAKRISHNA IYER, V.S.DESAI

Judgment

R. S. SARKARIA, J.:- This appeal by certificate is directed against an Appellant Judgment and Decree, dated November 15, 1968, of the High Court of Madras.

2. The facts leading to this appeal are as follows :

3. The following pedigree table will be helpful in understanding the relationship of the parties:

4. Palaniandi Pillai, shown in the above pedigree-table owned considerable properties. On December 12, 1927, he executed a will whereby he bequeathed certain properties to each of his three sons. He appointed his sons, Ramaswami Pillai and Vadivelu Pillai, as Executors of his will. In regard to his third son, Nataraja Pillai, the testator in clause 5 of the Will stated:"My third son, Nataraja Pillai, shall take the income accruing from the properties, namely, my cart-stand, house and ground, situate in the Western Row of Mint Street, bearing Municipal Door No. 278, Re-survey No. 600, Collectors Certificate No. 750 and the 5 Godowns, namely 2 Godowns situate in Varadaraja Mudali St., bearing Municipal Door Nos. 90 and 91, and 3 Godowns situate in 3rd North Beach Road bearing Municipal Doors Nos. 5, 6 and 7 to 9, Re-Survey Nos. 3158 and 3187, Collectors Certificate No. 2550. Af










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top