N.P.SINGH, K.VENKATASWAMI, J.S.VERMA
Manohar Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Nitin Bhaurao Patil – Respondent
ORDER
J. S. Verma, J.
1. This is an appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short "the R. P. Act") against the judgment dated 26-4-1993 by S.N.Variava, J. of the Bombay High Court in Election Petition No. 24 of 1990 whereby the election of the appellant Manohar Joshi to the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly from 32, Dadar Constituency of Greater Bombay held on 27-2-1990 has been declared to be void on the ground under Section 100(1)(b) of the R. P. Act.
2. Manohar Joshi was the candidate of the BJP-Shiv Sena alliance at that election while the original election petitioner Bhaurao Patil (now dead), was the candidate of the Congress (1) Party. Manohar Joshi secured the highest number of votes i.e. 47,737, while Bhaurao Patil secured 24,354 votes. Accordingly, Manohar Joshi was declared duly elected on 1-3-1990.
3. Admittedly, the last date for filing the election petition according to the limitation prescribed in sub-section (1)of Section 81 of the R. P. Act was 14-4-1990 but the election petition was actually presented in the Bombay High Court on 16-4-1990. It is also admitted that 14-4-1990 was a Saturday on which date the High Court as well as its
relied on : Jamaat-e-Islami Hind v. Union of India
followed : Bal Thackeray v. Prahhakar K. Kunte
relied on : Sahodrubni Rui v. Ram Singh Aharwar
A. Madan Mohan v. Kalavakunta Chandrasekhara
M. Karunanidhi v. Dr H.V. Handy
U.S. Sasidharan v. K. Karunakaran
applied : Ramlal v. Rewa Coalfields Ltd.
H.H. Raja Harinder Singh v. S. Karnil Singh
Hukmdev Nurain Yada v. Lalit Narain Mishra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.