SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 603

M.M.DUTT, RANGANATH MISRA, S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
M. Gopala Karup – Appellant
Versus
S. A. Abdul Rahim – Respondent


Advocates:
R.N.KESHWANI, V.BALACHANDRAN

(1) IN view of the decision of this court in Krishna Nair & Ors. v. Ghouse Basha (1987 4 SCC 404) and also considering in light of the facts found by the Appellate Authority which were not interfered with by the High court, we are of the opinion that even in the light of the observations of this court in Hameedia Hardware Stores v. D. Mohan Lal Sowcar (Judgment Today 19881 S.C. 664), the judgment under appeal cannot be interfered with.

(2) IN the premises, in view of the fact that the respondents require the premises bona fide for the purpose of their business, as found by the Appellate Authority, no interference is called for in this case. The appeal is dismissed. However, the appellant is in occupation of the premises for quite a long time and some time has to be given to them to adjust their affairs. In the premises we direct that the decree for eviction will not be executed till 31/12/1989 provided the appellant files the usual undertaking within four weeks from today. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top