SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1002

DORAISWAMY RAJU, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
R. Rajeshwaran – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.RAJENDRA BABU, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) RESPONDENT filed a writ petition in the High Court of Madras seeking a direction to the petitioner to apply the rule of reservation to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in respect of those seats which are set apart for all India pool in the M.B.B.S. or B.D.S. list. He had applied specifically in the category of scheduled caste and scheduled tribe for the All India Pre-medical Entrance Examination, 1999. However, when the results were published, he found that no separate list had been published in respect of that category. He contended that there is a constitutional obligation to provide a special reservation to the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes in the all India quota as otherwise, it would be violation of Article 15(4) of the Constitution of India. He sought for a direction to apply the rule of reservation.

(3) A learned single judge of the High Court held that the seats that are made available from various states are normally subject to the rule of reservation and the 15% of the seats allowed to the all India quota would, in the ordinary circumstances, have









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top