JUDGMENT

S.RAJENDRA BABU, J.

(1) THE appellant before us was appointed as a canal patwari in the year, 1995 and thereafter he sought for regular appointment by applying to the service selection board. That application was rejected. He filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the action of the board. It was disclosed that the appellant had passed matriculation examination conducted by the Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwa-vidyalaya in the year, 1989. It was found later on that the said Vishwavidyalaya is not a university established by law in India nor it has been declared to be a deemed university under section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 and he was found to possess certain qualifications which could not be taken note of and, therefore, the action of the board was upheld by the High Court in considering his case. Hence, this appeal.

(2) IT is brought to our notice that the appellant had passed 10+2 examination held by the Haryana Education Board which qualification is not suspected or doubtful. When the appellant possesses higher qualification from an appropriate board, we do not think it was necessary for the High Court to ex