SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. Bhagwati, CJI., RANGANATH MISRA, J.
Civil Appeal No. 4161 of 1986, (Arising out of Spl Leave Petn. (Civil) No. 3308 of 1986), D/- 7-11- 1986.
Suresh Pal, others, Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana, others, Respondents.
Physical Education - Certificate Course - On basis of this recognition granted by State to certificate course of physical education in this Institute in Amaravati, petitioners joined certificate course and were receiving instruction in this Institution when State derecognized certificate course with result that certificates obtained by petitioners at end of certificate course became useless for obtaining service as Physical Training Instructor - Petitioners, therefore, filed a Writ Petition in High Court for a writ directing State to recognise certificates obtained by them, because they had joined course on basis of recognition given by State and recognition was in force at time when they joined course - Held, Court is of view that since at time when petitioners joined course, it was recognised by Govt. and it was on basis of this recognition that petitioners joined course, it would be unjust to tell petitioners now that though at time of their joining course it was reognized, yet they cannot be given benefit of such recognition and certificates obtained by them would be futile, because during pendency of course it was derecognized by State Govt – Court would, therefore, allow appeal and direct State Govt. to recognize certificates obtained by petitioners and others similarly situate as a result of completing certificate course in Shri Hanuman Yayayam Prasarak Mandal Amravati for purpose of appointment as Physical Training Instructor in Govt. Schools - Of course, if any person has joined certificate course he would not be entitled to benefit of this order and any certificate obtained by him from Institute would be of no avail - There will be no order as to costs of appeal – Order accordingly.
ORDER:- Special Leave granted.
2. The certificate course in Physical Education in Shri Hanuman Vayayam Prasarak Mandal, Amravati, Maharashtra was recognized by the Government of Haryana in 1975 for appointment to the post of Physical Training Instructor in Govt. Schools in Haryana. On the basis of this recognition granted by the State of Haryana to the certificate course of physical education in this Institute in Amaravati, the petitioners joined the certificate course and were receiving instruction in this Institution until 9th January, 1985 when the State of Haryana derecognized the certificate course with the result that the certificates obtained by the petitioners at the end of the certificate course became useless for obtaining service as Physical Training Instructor in Haryana. The petitioners, therefore, filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana for a writ directing the State of Haryana to recognise the certificates obtained by them, because they had joined the course on the basis of the recognition given by the State of Haryana and the recognition was in force at the time when they joined the course. The Writ Petition was however rejected summarily by the High Court and hence the present appeal by special leave.
3. We are of the view that since at the time when the petitioners joined the course, it was recognised by the Govt. of Haryana and it was on the basis of this recognition that the petitioners joined the course, it would be unjust to tell the petitioners now that though at the time of their joining the course it was reognized, yet they cannot be given the benefit of such recognition and the certificates obtained by them would be futile, because during the pendency of the course it was derecognized by the State Govt. on 9th January, 1985. We would, therefore, allow the appeal and direct the State Govt. to recognize the certificates obtained by the petitioners and others similarly situate as a result of completing the certificate course in Shri Hanuman Yayayam Prasarak Mandal Amravati for the purpose of appointment as Physical Training Instructor in Govt. Schools in Haryana. Of course, if any person has joined the certificate course after 9th January, 1985 he would not be entitled to the benefit of this order and any certificate obtained by him from the said Institute would be of no avail. There will be no order as to costs of the appeal.
Order accordingly.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.