SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2069

G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
Escorts LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Another – Respondent


ORDER

1. These appeals arise out of an industrial dispute relating to termination of the services of Ishwar Singh, Respondent 2, (hereinafter referred to as "the workman") which was referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court. By award dated 9-3-1993 the Labour Court found that the service of the workman had been terrtiinated in violation of Sections 25-F and 25-G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and, therefore, the said termination was illegal and unjustified. The Labour Court has directed that the workman be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages. The writ petition filed by the appellant against the said award was dismissed in limine by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana by order dated 9-2-1994. The review petition filed by the appellant for the review of the said order was dismissed by order dated 27-5-1 994 These appeals have been filed by the appellant against both these a orders of the High Court.

2. Shri N. B. Shetye, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, has submitted that the Labour Court was in error in applying the provision of Section 25-F inasmuch as the workman had




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top