SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 770

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.B.MAJMUDAR
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Sehgal – Respondent


ORDER

An important constitutional question arises for consideration in these civil appeals and special leave petition. The post in the cadre is a solitary post of Chief Engineer in the service of State of Punjab. The question is whether for such a solitary post in the cadre the roster and reservation point can ever operate; or in other words, can there be any reservation as envisaged under Article 16(4) of the Constitution for a solitary post in the cadre. The other question is whether the system of carry forward of the reservation points for future vacancies in the cadre comprising the posts can ever be applicable if the entire cadre consists of a solitary post. In the two latest decisions of this Court, one by a three-Judge Bench in the case of Union of India v. Madhav [(1997) 2 SCC 332 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 503] and the other in the case of Union of India v. Brij Lal Thakur [(1997) 4 SCC 278 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 939 : JT (1997) 4 SC 195] this Court has taken the view that there can be reservation on roster points also for a solitary post in a cadre. In our view, these judgments require a relook in the light of the Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Arati Ray Choudhu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top