K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK, FAIZAN UDDIN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Madhav S/o Gajanan Chaubal – Respondent
ORDER
Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
2. On the last occasion when the matter had come up after notice, since the respondents were not represented either in person or through counsel and when the counsel had pointed out the decision followed by the Tribunal, namely, Dr. Chakradhar Pasvan v. State of Bihar1, this Court had referred the matter to three-Judge Bench. Thus, the matter has come up to-day. Even now, none is appearing for the respondents; nor are they appearing in person. We have taken the assistance of Shri Goswami, learned senior counsel. We requested him to place on record the decisions for or against him. He has fairly argued case.
3. The admitted facts are that in the National Savings Scheme Service, the Government had created various posts upto the post of Superintendent; there are number of posts but there is only one post of Secretary. This post is a feeder post for promotion as Regional Deputy Director in which category there are several posts. The Government applied the rule of reservation by rotation to the vacancies in the post of Secretary. 40 point roster is also being applied to these vacancies. In the post of Secretary, point No. 4 vacancy was reserved for Sched
Dr. Chakradhar Pasvan v. State of Bihar
Indra Sawhney & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
LIC of India v. Consumer Education & Research Centre
Smt. H.B. Usha v. D.S. Ramachandra
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes v. D. Sethu Madhva Rao
M. Venkteswarlu v. Govt. of A.P.
Arati Ray Choudhury v. Union of India & Ors.
R.K. Sabharwal & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.