SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 810

A.P.MISRA, B.N.KIRPAL, R.P.SETHI
Kiran Spinning Mills – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Customs – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.N.KIRPAL, J.

(1) THE short question that arises for consideration relates to the levy of additional duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

(2) THE appellants had, between 4th of April, 1977. and 20th September, 1978 imported acrylic polyster fibre. The imported articles were placed in the bonded warehouse after they had landed in India.

(3) ON 3rd of October, 1978. The Additional Duty of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Ordinance, 1978 was promulgated which came into force w.e.f. 19th October, 1978. In terms of the Ordinance articles were charged with an additional duty of excise equal to 10 per cent of the basic excise duty payable on such articles under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. It is not in dispute that correspondingly under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 additional duty on such articles which were imported became payable equivalent to the additional excise duty levied under the said Ordinance.

(4) THE articles which were imported by ; the appellants were cleared from the bonded warehouse after 4th October, 1978. The customs Authorities demanded an additional duty at the rate of





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top