SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 351

M.SRINIVASAN, S.C.AGRAWAL, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
R. D. Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Judgement

ORDER :- By order dated March 19, 1996 this Court had given certain directions to the Delhi Administration in the matter of grant of bail in respect of under trial prisoners who are undergoing imprisonment in respect of various offences. Nearly two years have elapsed since the passing of the said order. This period would have given an idea to the authorities regarding the impact of the order on the general law and order situation. We, therefore, direct the Commissioner of Police, Delhi to submit a report in the form of an affidavit indicating the impact of the directions contained in the said order of this Court on the general law and order situation in the National Capital Region of Delhi. While submitting the said report the Commissioner will also indicate as to whether any of the persons who has been released in pursuance of this direction has repeated the offence after his release. The said affidavit may be filed within six weeks.

2. As regards the other State Governments/Union Territories to whom notices have been issued it is directed that each State Government/Union Territory shall file an affidavit indicating the present position relating to various categories of un





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top