SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1051

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Jagir Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
G.K.BANSAL

( 1 ) THOUGH respondents have been served, none is appearing.

( 2 ) LEAVE granted.

( 3 ) THE award of the Additional District Judge is dated 2/3/1978. When the State had gone in appeal against the award, while dismissing the appeals, the High court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh had granted additionalbenefits under the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1894. Sub-section (1 of Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act) envisages determination of the amount of compensation to be awarded to the acquired land. Ss. (I-A) envisages that "in addition" to the market value of the land, as above provided, the court shall in every case award an amount calculated @ 12 per centum per annum on such market value for the period commencing on from the date of the publication of the notification under Section 4 (1 to the date of the award of the Collector or the date of taking possession of the land, whichever is earlier. Ss. (2 also provides that "in addition" to the market value of the land, as above provided, the court shall in every case award a sum of 30 per centum on such market value in consideration of the compulsory nature of acquisition.

( 4 ) SECTION 28 envisag



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top