SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1559

A.S.ANAND, K.T.THOMAS
Bandlamuddi Atchuta Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) HOW the barks of a dog could have snowballed into the murder of a young student, is the nub of the story narrated in this case. Police charge-sheeted Sambasiva Rao and his father Atchuta Ramaiah as also another relative of them for the murder of the young man (Srinivasa Rao) and also for causing hurt to some others. Sessions Court acquitted the father (Atchuta Ramaiah),but convicted Sambasiva Rao under Section 304 (Part2) besides sections 326 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and awarded a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for five years to him for the main offence. The remaining accused was convicted under section 324, IPC and was sentenced to R. I. for one year. High Court of Andhra Pradesh, on appeal, convicted Sambasiva Rao under section 302, IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life. By the same judgment, the High Court set aside the acquittal of his father and convicted him under section 326 read with section34 of the Indian Penal Code and a sentence of R. I. for three years has been awarded to him. High Court passed the same conviction and sentence as against third accused also. Hence, all the three have filed this appeal jointly under Section 2 of the Supr




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top