FAIZAN UDDIN, G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Babu Singh Bains – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
( 1 ) APPLICATION for impleadment is dismissed.
( 2 ) LEAVE granted in the special leave petition.
( 3 ) THE City of beauty, Chandigarh, carefully architectured and meticulosuly executed as a modal city in India by famous architect, Shri Le. Corbursier when it was getting desideration compounded by disfiguration of beauty and elegance, statutory regulations stepped in to stamp out erosion and to restore its natural environment. These cases are instances of blatent misusage of the buildings or plots in the planned structures
( 4 ) THIS appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court made on 27/01/1993 in C. W. P. No. 14183/92 upholding the order of the Estate Officer who refused to condone the delay in making application under Rule 11-D of the Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Buildings) (Amendment) Rules, 1979 (for short. the "rules" ).
( 5 ) THE writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by the petitioner challenging the validity of Section 8a of the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (Punjab Act of 1952) (for short, the "act" ).
( 6 ) THE facts are long and tendentious. Suffice it to state
Northern India Caterers (P) Ltd. v. State of Punjab
referred to : R.C. Chawla v. State of Haryana
relied on : Chandigarh Admn. v. Johnson Paints and Varnish Co.
referred to : Jagdish Chand Radhey Shyam v. State of Punjab
Maganlal Chhaganlal (P) Ltd. v. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.