SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1434

FAIZAN UDDIN, G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Babu Singh Bains – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


( 1 ) APPLICATION for impleadment is dismissed.

( 2 ) LEAVE granted in the special leave petition.

( 3 ) THE City of beauty, Chandigarh, carefully architectured and meticulosuly executed as a modal city in India by famous architect, Shri Le. Corbursier when it was getting desideration compounded by disfiguration of beauty and elegance, statutory regulations stepped in to stamp out erosion and to restore its natural environment. These cases are instances of blatent misusage of the buildings or plots in the planned structures

( 4 ) THIS appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court made on 27/01/1993 in C. W. P. No. 14183/92 upholding the order of the Estate Officer who refused to condone the delay in making application under Rule 11-D of the Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Buildings) (Amendment) Rules, 1979 (for short. the "rules" ).

( 5 ) THE writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by the petitioner challenging the validity of Section 8a of the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (Punjab Act of 1952) (for short, the "act" ).

( 6 ) THE facts are long and tendentious. Suffice it to state










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top