SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1011

B.N.KIRPAL, J.S.VERMA
Collector Of Central Excise, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Coimbatore Pioneer Fertilizers LTD. – Respondent


( 1 ). The only question for decision in these appeals is whether pulverisation of rock phosphate amounts to a process of manufacture so as to make it exigible to duty in terms of Entry No. 14-HH of the Schedule to the central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The tribunal has held that it is not a process of manufacture and, therefore, no duty is leviable. The Department has come up in appeal against the tribunals decision.

( 2 ). Learned counsel for the appellant referred to another decision of the tribunal reported in Pyrites Phosphates and Chemicals Ltd. v. CCE taking the opposite view. The reasoning of that decision is contained in para 19 of the judgment. In support of the view taken in Pyrites Phosphates reliance was placed by the tribunal on the decision of the Delhi High court in hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. v. Union of India which decision of the Delhi High court has been reversed by this court in Hyderabad industries Ltd. v. Union of India. The view taken by the tribunal in Pyrites phosphates is, therefore, untenable.

( 3 ). We find no ground to differ from the view taken by the tribunal in the present case.

( 4 ). THE appeals are, therefore, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top