SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. AHMADI, C.J.I. AND S.P. BHARUCHA AND K.S. PARIPOORNAN, JJ.
HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANOTHER
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Civil Appeals No. 1354 of 1980 with Nos. 1355-60 of 1980{From the Judgment and Order dated 23-5-1980 of the Delhi High Court in C.W.P. No. 48 of 1978 :(1980) 6 ELT 735}, SLP (C) No. 11674 of 1981, W.P. (C) No. 6445 of 1982, C.A. No. 4906 of 1990 and W.P. (C) No. 2250 of 1981
Decided on 21-7-1995
Advocates appeared:
M. Chandrasekharan, Additional Solicitor General, Shanti Bhushan, A.K. Ganguli, A.K. Sen, R.F. Nariman, V.A. Bobde, H.N. Salve, Dr V. Gauri Shankar, Soli J. Sorabjee and V.C. Mahajan, Senior Advocates (N.K. Bajpai, S.D. Sharma, G. Prakash, P. Parameswaran, V.K. Verma, Ravinder Narain, Ms Amrita Mitra, Rajan Narain, Advocates for JBD & Co., Aseem Mehrotra, Darshan Singh, Suman Khaitan, Shalini Lums, Rahul Roy, Advocates for Khaitan & Co., Satish Agarwal, Ms P. Gautam, Pramod B. Agarwala, D.A. Dave, R.N. Karanjawala, Bhasker Pradhan, Manik Karanjawala, Ms Vidula, R. Ashok, S. Rajappa, P. Narasimhan, Sarwa Mitter, Pradeep Kumar, Advocates for Mitter & Mitter Co., Advocates, with them) for the appearing parties.
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3(1) - Levy of Customs Duty – Asbestos - Process of Manufacture - Value of asbestos ensues from incombustible nature of products fabricated from various grades of mineral fibres - Most asbestos fibres occur in small cracks in massive rocks and are difficult to recover e.g. a large cubic open pit mine handles approximately 16 tons of ore 8 tons of waste ore and 23 tons of overburden to produce a single ton of asbestos. To mine chrysotile, the ore is first blasted loose – Held, Expression "excise duty for the time being leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India" in Section 3(1) means the excise duty that "would be leviable on the class of description of article to which the imported article belongs". Excise duty is leviable on the class or description of article to which the imported article belongs if articles of that class or description are exigible to excise duty, having undergone production or manufacture - If they have not undergone production or manufacture they are not exigible to excise duty. Articles of that class or description of goods when imported are, then, not liable to additional duty - Assumption underlying the Explanation to Section 3(1) would appear to be that an imported article which is result of production or manufacture can be produced or manufactured in India; emphasis in the assumption is on words in India - If imported article is the result of production or manufacture, it must be assumed that it can be produced or manufactured in India. In this context the Statement of Objects and Reasons is relevant. It says that the levy of additional duty on an imported article is provided for to counterbalance the excise duty leviable on the like article made indigenously – Order Accordingly
JUDGMENT
BHARUCHA, J.- The appellants (original writ petitioners) import asbestos fibre and pay customs duty thereon under Entry 25.01.32, which reads:
"Mineral substances, not elsewhere specified ... :
(1) * * *
(2) Asbestos raw including fibre 40%
(2) * * *
There is no dispute in regard to the levy of customs duty. The dispute is in regard to the levy on the imported asbestos fibre of additional duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, which is quoted hereinafter. The appellant in Civil Appeal No. 1354 of 1980 also mines asbestos in India and is made liable to pay excise duty thereon under Tariff Item 22-F, which reads thus:
________________________________________________________________________
"Item
No.
Description of goods
Rate of Duty
________________________________________________________________________
22-F
Mineral Fibres and yarn, and
manufactures therefrom in or in relation to the manufacture of which any process is ordinarily carried on with the aid of power.
Fifteen per cent ad
valorem
Explanation : Mineral fibres and yarn, and manufactures therefrom shall be deemed to include :
(i) glass fibre and yarn including
glass tissues and glasswool;
(ii) asbestos fibre and yarn;
(iii) any other mineral fibre or yarn,
whether continuous or otherwise
such as slagwool and rock wool;
and
(iv) manufactures containing other
than asbestos cement products."
This levy is also disputed. By the common judgment under appeal, the Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petitions.
2. The constitutionality of the imposition of excise duty on asbestos fibre is not now disputed.
3. What asbestos is and how it is recovered is set out in the judgment under appeal, and it is not faulted on this account. This is what it says:
"Major producers of asbestos are Canada and USSR. Asbestos is defined as general name for the useful fibrous varieties of a number of rock forming minerals. The value of asbestos ensues from the incombustible nature of the products fabricated from the various grades of mineral fibres. [Vide McGraw Hills Encyclopaedia of Science and Technology, Vol. 1 (1977), p. 618.] Most asbestos fibres occur in small cracks in massive rocks and are difficult to recover e.g. a large cubic open pit mine handles approximately 16 tons of ore. 8 tons of waste ore and 23 tons of overburden to produce a single ton of asbestos. To mine chrysotile, the ore is first blasted loose. The larger asbestos seams i.e. those that are at least 9.5 mm wide are picked from the ore after blasting and adhering rock is removed with a pick. The resulting chunks of ore called crudes, which may contain as much as 30% water, are then dried in preparation for the next stage - separation into fibres. Fibre separation is accomplished mainly by a series of shaking screens, special separators called cyclones, and additional crushers or fibrizers. At each shaking screen the liberated fibres are sucked off by an airstream and collected for grading and packaging. The larger pieces of ore, which are retained by the screen are recycled for further crushing. Smaller pieces, which pass through the screen and are called throughs, are sent to the next crushing or fiberizing sequence. The extremely small pieces that fall through the screens following the final fiberizer are discarded. [Vide Encyclopaedia Americana, Vol. II (1970), pp. 427, 428.]
Similarly the Encyclopaedia of Natural Chemical Analysis, Vol. II gives the processing of asbestos fibre as follows:
Asbestos fibre is recovered by open pit or underground mining operations. In the open pit operation, the ore is taken from the top of the deposit and in underground method, the ore is removed from the bottom of the deposit. One imported method used in underground mining is known as block carving. In this method, a large block of ore is loosened in such a way that it breaks down from its own weight. The ore is extracted through a network of tunnels and carried to primary crushers which break up the large rock chunks into fra
relied on : Minerals and Metals Trading Corpn. of India Ltd. v. Union of India
Moti Laminates (P) Ltd. v. CCE
doubted : Khandelwal Metal and Engineering Works v. Union of India
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.