SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M.Ahmadi : M.M.Punchhi
Government Of A.P.: K.V.Raghavendra Rao: K.Srinivasulu: K.Ramanujam: Government Of A.P.: V.Hanumantha Rao
Versus
P.Dilip Kumar: State Of A.P.: State Of A.P.: Y.V.Satyanarayana Rao: Y.V.Satyanarayana Rao: Government Of A.P.
Case No. : 1710 of 1990
Date of Decision : 2/3/93
Advocates Appeared: Chari T.V.S.N. : Chinnaswamy M.A. : Gambhir S.K. : Gambhir Vivek : Khanna J.M. : Krishnamoorthy M.A. : Kumar K.Ram : Prabhakar Guntur : Ramamurthi M.K. : Ramamurthy C. : Rao A.D.N. : Rao A.Subba : Rao H.S.Guru Raj : Rao Y.P. : Reddy K.Madhava : Salve H.N.
Constitution of India – Articles 14/16 – Deputy Executive Engineers in Roads & Buildings Engineering Service Rules, 1987 –BY Advertisement, the Andhra Pradesh public service commission (for short PSC) invited applications for 60 vacancies in the cadre of Deputy Executive Engineers in different services: (a) R & B Engineering Service, (b) P.H. & M. Engineering Service, (c) Engineering Service and (d) Panchayat Raj Engineering Service in the common scale of to be filled by direct recruitment – These vacancies were shown in the advertisement at Code G-l under the head central Recruitment – Educational and other qualifications for the posts in question were set out to be Bachelor of Engineering degree (Highways, Civil or Mechanical) of a recognised University for (a) and (d) services, a degree in Civil or Mechanical Engineering of a recognised University for (b) service and a degree in Bachelor of Engineering, Civil or Mechanical of a recognised University for (c) service – Insofar as (b) category is concerned, it was mentioned that preference shall be given to persons possessing five years experience in Irrigation or Execution of Water Supply and Drainage Scheme –Held, IN the present case also the zone of consideration was narrowed by eliminating candidates who did not succeed in the qualifying test and out of those who succeeded in the qualifying test and secured the minimum marks after interview were considered and thereafter in the process of selection the preference rule was applied by first choosing the post-graduates and there-after the graduates – Court have already pointed out above that classification on the basis of higher educational qualification with a view to achieving improvement in administrative performance is not abhorrent constitution are, therefore, of the opinion that the view taken by the learned Single Judge of the High court on a true interpretation of the relevant rule in the context of the historical background was a plausible view and should commend acceptance as it would advance the cause of efficiency in a highly technical service – Court therefore, think that even if two views were possible, the tribunal ought not to have unsettled the legal position settled earlier by the High court with which even this court refused to interfere in SLP. For the foregoing reasons we do not approve of the view subsequently taken by the tribunal – Writ Petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT
A.M.AHMADI, J.
(1) BY Advertisement No. 6/88 dated 1/12/1988, the Andhra Pradesh public service commission (for short PSC) invited applications for 60 vacancies in the cadre of Deputy Executive Engineers in different services: (a) R & B Engineering Service, (b) P.H. & M. Engineering Service, (c) Engineering Service and (d) Panchayat Raj Engineering Service in the common scale of Rs. 1980-3500 to be filled by direct recruitment. These vacancies were shown in the advertisement at Code G-l under the head central Recruitment. The educational and other qualifications for the posts in question were set out to be Bachelor of Engineering degree (Highways, Civil or Mechanical) of a recognised University for (a) and (d) services, a degree in Civil or Mechanical Engineering of a recognised University for (b) service and a degree in Bachelor of Engineering, Civil or Mechanical of a recognised University for (c) service. Insofar as (b) category is concerned, it was mentioned that preference shall be given to persons possessing five years experience in Irrigation or Execution of Water Supply and Drainage Scheme. In respect of posts in (a) and (c) categories, it was further mentioned that post-graduate qualification of an Indian or Foreign University shall be treated as an additional qualification and preference shall be given to such candidates. Para 7 of the advertisement stated that the selection will be made on the basis of written examination to be followed by oral test/interview for the posts in Code G-1. The scheme of examination was detailed in Annx. 6 of the advertisement. Pursuant to the said advertisement both graduates and post-graduates applied for the posts in question and were subjected to a written test and those who secured the qualifying marks were called for oral test/interviews. Some candidates who did not secure the qualifying marks and were not called for oral test/interviews filed O.A. Nos. 1736 to 1739 of 1990 contending that they ought to have been called and the total number of marks secured both at the written examination and oral test should have been taken into consideration for the purpose of determining the successful candidates to be empanelled for appointment to the posts in question.
(2) THE PSC on an interpretation of the relevant rule as placed by the High court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition No. 2568 of 1982 decided by Waghray, J. on 14/03/1986 first selected post-graduate engineers for the available vacancies under open competition and since sufficient number of post-graduates were available, no graduate was selected for the posts in question. In the category of reserved seats for backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, post-graduates to the extent they were available were selected and in the case of non-availability of post-graduates,graduates were selected for appointment to the posts in question. It would at this stage be relevant to reproduce the rule in question:
"RULE 4. Qualifications.No person shall be eligible for appointment to the category and by the method mentioned in columns (1 and (2 of the following table unless he possesses the qualifications prescribed in the corresponding entry in column (3 thereof:
Category
Method of Recruitment
Qualifications
Dy. Executive
Direct Recruitment
(i) Must not have completed 28
Engineer
years of age on first date of
July of the year in which the
recruitment is made provided
that those possessing postgraduate
qualifications shall be
allowed age concession to the
extent of 2 years.
(ii) Must possess the B.E.
Degree (Civil or Mechl.) of a
University in India, established
or incorporated by/or under a
Central Act, Provincial Act, or
a State Act, or an institution
recognised by the Central
University Grants Commission
or an equivalent qualification.
Note 1: Post-Graduate qualification of an Indian or of Foreign University shall be treated as an additional qualification and preference shall be given t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.