SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 25

ARIJIT PASAYAT, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Devendra Nath Rai – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—The Union of India, Chief of Army Staff (Army Headquarters), General Officer Commanding, Commanding Officer, 502, Area Defence Group and the Commanding Officer, 1, Corps, Artillery Brigade are in appeal against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court directing the authorities to re-consider the question of sentence to be awarded to the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the ‘accused’). In the Court martial proceedings, the accused was awarded death sentence for having caused homicidal death of two army personnel and for having caused grievous injuries with the intent of causing murder of two others. The award of death penalty by the Court Martial was affirmed by the Central Government under Section 153 of the Army Act, 1950 (in short the ‘Army Act’).

2. Factual position as projected by the appellants in a nutshell is as follows:-

On 15.10.1991, the accused was on the quarter guard duty along with SCR Swamy, Y. Prasad and GS Pandey respectively (P.Ws. 4, 5 and 6). The first one was the Guard Commander and the other two were the sentries. The Rifle bearing butt No. 32 and registered No. BV- 3528 was being used by the sentries for perf
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top