SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 17

RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Shreyas Papers Pvt. LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

Srikrishna, J.—There are three questions of law to be decided in these appeals:

2. Firstly, whether the purchaser of assets of a concern sold by a State Financial Corporation, in exercise of its powers under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (hereinafter "the SFC Act"), would be liable under the Karnataka Sales Tax, 1957 (hereinafter "the KST Act"), for the arrears of sales tax of the concern whose assets have been transferred?

3. Secondly, under what circumstances does a charge created on a property become unenforceable against a transferee of such a property?

4. Finally, whether a completely novel relief, not argued/claimed before the High Court or decided by the impugned judgment, may be claimed before this Court?

The Facts in Civil Appeal 3170/2000

5. A company by name Mishal Paper Mills (P) Ltd. (hereinafter "the Defaulting Company"), was running a medium-scale duplex board manufacturing unit. The Second Respondent, Karnataka State Industrial Investment & Development Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter "the Corporation"), had extended financial assistance to the Defaulting Company. However, the Defaulting Company defaulted in repayment of the loans granted













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top